Comments on: Deforestation: Proposed EU Import Ban May Fail to Protect Tropical Rainforests and Farmers – Here’s How it Should Work https://dailycoffeenews.com/2023/01/18/deforestation-proposed-eu-import-ban-may-fail-to-protect-tropical-rainforests-and-farmers-heres-how-it-should-work/ Business news for specialty coffee professionals Fri, 29 Dec 2023 17:19:20 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.2 By: Tionico https://dailycoffeenews.com/2023/01/18/deforestation-proposed-eu-import-ban-may-fail-to-protect-tropical-rainforests-and-farmers-heres-how-it-should-work/#comment-480985 Thu, 19 Jan 2023 07:26:16 +0000 https://dailycoffeenews.com/?p=167230#comment-480985 Maybe I’m missing something here but I don’t think so. Deforestation happens when someone has a “better” use for the land the forest occupies. Most times that is a commercial crop that can bring income to the producer, unlike the typical mixed growth forest or savannah. As forests age their growh slows, which means they fix less carbon dioxide and release less oxygen. I am guessing (heh heh) that the effect of removing carbon dioxide from the air is the one thing at highest issue in the drive to reduce deforestation. Fine. The thing is, when slow-growing forests are taken out and the land converted to producing some cash crop (soy, cacao, coffee, cane, bananas, whatver) the raoid growth of the commercial crop “fixes’ far more arbon dioxide than the slow-growing old growth forest. Thus converting land now hosting old growth forest into productive agricultural land ends up “fixing” more carbon dioxide.

I’ve lived in the Pacific Northwest for above fifty years now, and have “seen some things”. I’ve walked old growth Doiug Fir, Western Red Cedar, and both redwood and sequoia forests. Yes they are magnificent. But to say no one should ever cut any of this is crazy. Yes, preserve some of it. But all? Nah.
I remember driving in one particular area back in the early ’70’s and seeing old grown fir along both sides of the highway for one stretch. It was eventually clearcut. Oh my oh my…. but wait. In five years new trees had been planted and were tall enough to notice driving by. More Doug fir, by their look. Over the years they grew.. were harvested again.. replanted……and are now nearing harvest time once more. Same piece of dirt as produced two more crops of valuable high quality Douglas fir in the 50 years I’ve watched it. AND acted as a “carbon sink” by absorbing and fixing three times the CO2 that would have been the case had the original old growth been left to its own devices. Funny thing, since the current crop has been growing since before the EU cutoff date of 2006, when that timber is harvested and turned into whatever products it will be, NONE of it can be exported Tinto the EU. How crazy is that?

]]>